/[CCFs]/ccfdev/packages/emos-quantumef/ChangeLog
ViewVC logotype

Annotation of /ccfdev/packages/emos-quantumef/ChangeLog

Parent Directory Parent Directory | Revision Log Revision Log


Revision 1.17 - (hide annotations)
Wed Dec 18 11:53:40 2002 UTC (21 years, 11 months ago) by rsaxton
Branch: MAIN
CVS Tags: version_1_10
Changes since 1.16: +6 -0 lines
Committed through make

1 dlumb 1.6 ChangeLog for emos-quantumeff
2     ============================
3 rsaxton 1.17 VERSION 1.10 - 2002-12-16 (RDS)
4     -----------
5     Issue 0014
6     Set the pattern fractions in channel space more accurately so
7     that they can be used within epatplot
8    
9 rsaxton 1.16 VERSION 1.9 - 2002-11-22 (RDS)
10     -----------
11     Issue 0013
12     Add in pattern fractions for timing and burst modes
13     Add in a CHBINS_FRACTION extension
14    
15 rsaxton 1.15 VERSION 1.8 - 2002-06-28 (RDS)
16     -----------
17     Iss 0012
18     Return to the values in Version 1.6 which are now further
19     substantiated by work by Philippe Marty.
20    
21 dlumb 1.14 VERSION 1.7 - 2002-03-27 (DHL)
22     -----------
23     Iss 0011
24     Seems like that SAS v 5.3 won't go out with the required
25     vignetting
26     corrections so we need a quick fudge to get the MOS2 and MOS1 QE's
27     back into an alignment that temporarily gives reasonable results,
28     while not maintaining the old Leicester QE's with known
29     deficiencies. MOS2 only changed..
30    
31 dlumb 1.13 VERSION 1.6 - 2002-03-07 (DHL)
32     -----------
33     Iss 0011
34     Made an error in adding up only patterns 0:12 into the QE_TOT
35     extensions
36     So this version should now have patterns 0:31
37    
38 dlumb 1.12 VERSION 1.5 - 2002-03-01 (DHL)
39 dlumb 1.13 -----------
40 dlumb 1.12 Iss 0011
41 dlumb 1.13 Fixed the data for the QE, by making the high energy (>1.5keV) points
42     match a detection depth provided on a CCD-CCD case from the Orsay data
43     (see below). At lower energies I just take the existing sets from the
44     Leicester response matrices (q20 versions) and merge into the higher
45     energy data. I note that we are matching a response of 0-12 patterns
46     only, so we do not truly expect the curve to fit a simple Si depth
47     -due to effect of energy thresholds and event splitting, but the Orsay
48     data are a pretty good match. On echange i made was to get a good fit
49     just below the Si K edge & there is put in a depth of 32um for ALL
50     chips
51    
52     Values used were: MOS1, CCD 1-7 25.8,29.6,28.8,25.3,28.4,28.2,27.8
53     MOS2, CCD 1-7 28.0,27.4,26.8,28.8,28.8,26.4,28.2
54     Note that in MOS2 CCDS4&5 were never measured on ground so I took an
55     average value based on other CCDS from the same manufactured batch
56 dlumb 1.12
57 rsaxton 1.11 VERSION 1.4 - 2002-01-30 (RDS)
58     -----------
59     Iss 0010
60    
61     Add in extra units and remove quotes from region string
62    
63 rsaxton 1.10 VERSION 1.3 - 2002-01-24 (RDS)
64     -----------
65     Iss 0010
66    
67     Add in extra pattern fraction tables (SCR-72)
68    
69 dlumb 1.9 VERSION 1.2 - 2002-01-08 (DL)
70     -----------
71     Iss 0009
72    
73     To fix SPR2178 I changed the region descriptor from POLYGON type to
74     BOX type. This not only clears up ambiguity on the borders of the shape
75     but probably speeds up the calculation.
76    
77 dlumb 1.8 VERSION 1.1 - 2001-09-20 (DL)
78     -----------
79     Iss 0008
80    
81     Updated for version 5.2 of SAS. We realise that there was a double
82     accounting of the pattern fractions so that at 10keV (for exampel)
83     the 50% fraction of 0-12 patterns was doubly applied. This led to
84     a gradually decreasing QE with Energy compared with the true expected
85     QE
86    
87 dlumb 1.7 VERSION 1.0 - 2001-07-19 (DL)
88     -----------
89     Updated for version 5.1 of SAS to make the SAS arfgen reproduce
90     consistent data with the LUX-supplied response matrices.
91     Addedd additional energy anchor points at 0eV and 30keV to aid
92     interpolation.
93     High energy points are scaled according to a silicon absorption depth
94     which was measured at Orsay - now we have a good cross-match to CCD
95     fabrication batch which allows an estimate even for thoise CCDS which
96     were never measured at Orsay.
97 dlumb 1.6 VERSION 0.6 - 2000-09-6 (DL)
98     -----------
99     Further analysis of fligh tdata at Licester allowed better
100     reconciliation with the analytical QE models. In addition we
101     introduce far more energy data to allow for better interpolation. There
102     are still problems around the O edge and below 300eV, so we need to
103     understand modifications in RMF to make progress at this point.
104    
105 dlumb 1.5 VERSION 0.5 - 2000-06-23 (DL)
106     -----------
107     The initial flight calibration revealed discrepancies at the O edge
108     and the lowest energy reponses. These were attributed mainly to
109     systematic errors in the monitoring process at the Orsay synchrotron.
110     New empirical fits to the data were provided by Leicester, and these
111     have been compared with new SCISIM runs, utilising the best latest
112     electrode structure used in the Leicester analystical QE model fit. A
113     combination of LUX data, and an extension BELOW the Si L edge for the
114     SCISIM data allows a hopefully better fit. In addition I have modified
115     the QE's for the outer CCDs of each camera, where there are systematic
116     differences in QE at > 5keV. These can be attributed to ddifferences
117     in silicon resistivity translating to different depletion depths. The
118     QE data for this at Orsay is equivocal, so I take average trends in
119     increased efficiency between 5 and 12keV and allocate a best estimate
120     of increased depletion depth to this, and in return modify the overall
121     QE curves as a result. I am suspicious, though that all QE's are
122     GREATER tahn the central CCD, and this may indicate a systematic bias
123     in the measurment method at Orsay.
124    
125     The new data sets should give good results to about 10% accuracy at
126     worst case small energy scales (eg EXAFS scales at silicon edges etc.)
127    
128 dlumb 1.4 VERSION 0.4 - 2000-05-23 (DL)
129     -----------
130     FIxed error of missing pattern 1 data for CCD5
131 dlumb 1.3 VERSION 0.3 - 2000-02-23 (DL)
132     -----------
133     FIxed numerical problem in the data files (some values >>1 )
134    
135 ulammers 1.2 Version 0.2 - 2000-02-17 (UL)
136     -----------
137     + fixed minor problem with REGION expression in data files
138 ulammers 1.1
139 ulammers 1.2 Version 0.1 - 2000-02-09 (DL)
140 ulammers 1.1 -----------
141     + created by DL

  ViewVC Help
Powered by ViewVC 1.1.27